Government funding priorities: sport vs arts
Question
Some people believe that national and local governments should spend more of their budgets on sports facilities and programmes, while others argue that the arts deserve greater financial support. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Write at least 250 words. You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Model essay (estimated band 7.0 · 291 words)
Governments often face difficult choices about how to allocate public funds, and the debate over spending on sport versus the arts is a common example. Both areas offer benefits to society, but I believe that public funding should be weighted in favour of sport while still maintaining reasonable support for the arts.
Those who favour greater investment in sport point to clear public-health advantages. Well-funded local sports facilities and programmes encourage physical activity, which reduces chronic disease and cuts long-term healthcare costs. For example, community exercise schemes and youth football clubs offer structured outlets for energy and can deter young people from antisocial behaviour. Sport also generates immediate economic returns through events and tourism: a regional stadium or annual marathon can bring visitors who spend money in hotels, restaurants and shops.
Supporters of arts funding argue that culture is essential for a society’s identity and intellectual life. Museums, galleries and theatre companies preserve heritage, foster creativity and attract a different kind of visitor. The arts can also improve education and social inclusion by giving marginalised groups a voice. Nevertheless, many arts projects serve relatively small, often affluent, audiences and their economic benefits are usually slower to materialise than those of sport.
A balanced approach is therefore best. Core arts institutions should receive stable funding to protect cultural heritage and ensure access, while more flexible, performance-based grants could be used elsewhere. At the same time, prioritising community sports infrastructure will deliver measurable health and social gains. Sport programmes for young people offers them routine, mentorship and a sense of belonging.
In conclusion, I agree that governments should place greater emphasis on sport spending because of its broad, immediate impacts, but this should not come at the expense of preserving vital cultural institutions.
Band commentary
- Task Response
- The essay addresses the prompt and gives a clear position: "I believe that public funding should be weighted in favour of sport while still maintaining reasonable support for the arts." It discusses both views and supports the chosen stance with relevant examples, such as "community exercise schemes and youth football clubs" and the economic role of "a regional stadium or annual marathon." The conclusion restates the opinion and offers a balanced resolution.
- Coherence & Cohesion
- Ideas are organised logically with clear paragraphing and linking phrases like "Those who favour...", "Supporters of arts funding...", and "A balanced approach is therefore best." The progression from benefits of sport to benefits of arts and then to a compromise is easy to follow. For example, the transition sentence "Nevertheless, many arts projects serve relatively small, often affluent, audiences..." helps contrast the two sides.
- Lexical Resource
- The essay uses a range of vocabulary appropriate to the topic, such as "public-health advantages," "cultural heritage," "social inclusion," and "performance-based grants." Word choice is generally precise: "reduces chronic disease," "measurable health and social gains," and "preserve heritage" are good examples of varied lexis used accurately.
- Grammatical Range & Accuracy
- The candidate shows a mix of complex and simple sentence structures, for example: "Sport also generates immediate economic returns through events and tourism: a regional stadium or annual marathon can bring visitors..." However, there is a noticeable grammatical slip in the sentence "Sport programmes for young people offers them routine, mentorship and a sense of belonging." (subject-verb agreement error: "programmes... offer"). Overall accuracy is good despite this occasional mistake.
Estimated band scores for practice only. Not affiliated with or endorsed by IELTS, the British Council, IDP or Cambridge.